Comparison

Satsu vs Google Analytics

Google Analytics is free, but in the EU it comes with a consent banner, your visitors' data on Google's side, and sampling in large explorations. Satsu is a cookieless alternative with no banner to lose visitors to — plus AI-assistant traffic and site-health audits in the same product.

Why teams pick Satsu over Google Analytics

No cookie banner, no lost visitors

GA4 needs a consent banner in the EU in practice, and every visitor who clicks 'reject' vanishes from your numbers. Satsu sets no cookies and keeps no persistent identifiers, so in our assessment no banner is needed and you count everyone. Check with your own counsel for your site.

Your data isn't the product

GA is free because your visitors' data fuels Google's ad business. Satsu is a paid product; your data is yours, stored on Hetzner servers in Finland, never sold or sampled.

AI traffic, and whether AI recommends you

GA4 has had a default AI Assistant channel since May 2026. Satsu also breaks out ChatGPT, Perplexity, Claude and Gemini, and on Pro and Business it checks whether Claude recommends you — per prompt, with the exact wording. Your agent can read all of it over MCP.

More than analytics

Satsu also audits your SEO and accessibility (Pro and Business) and monitors uptime on every plan — one privacy-first place instead of GA4 plus three other tools.

Satsu vs Google Analytics, side by side

Feature SatsuGoogle Analytics
Price€6/mo (500k events)Free (ad-funded)
Cookie consent bannerNot needed in our assessmentNeeded in the EU in practice
Data samplingNeverIn explorations above 10M events
AI-traffic channelNative, per assistantYes (AI Assistant channel)
Data locationHetzner, FinlandNot checked
SEO + accessibility auditsPro and BusinessNo
SetupOne script tagTag + consent banner (EU) + config
Install from code + agent accessnpx init + MCP (read and set up)Official MCP (read-only by default)
E-commerce depthFocusedVery deep

Google Analytics details checked 5 Nov 2026. Sources: GA channel groups, GA sampling, GA MCP server.

Where Google Analytics is the better choice

No tool wins on everything. Google Analytics is genuinely stronger here — if these matter most to you, it may be the better fit.

  • GA4 is free and hard to beat on raw cost if privacy isn't a concern.
  • It has far deeper e-commerce and funnel reporting for large online stores.
  • It integrates tightly with Google Ads and the wider Google marketing stack.

The honest summary: if you want cookieless analytics with no consent banner, AI traffic as its own channel, and SEO, accessibility and uptime in one privacy-first place — with a free tier that never expires — Satsu is built for you.

  • Cookieless — no consent banner
  • AI-assistant traffic as its own channel
  • SEO and accessibility audits on Pro and Business, uptime on every plan
  • Free tier, no card, no expiry

Frequently asked questions

Is Satsu a real Google Analytics alternative?

Yes. Satsu covers the core web analytics most sites use GA4 for — visitors, pages, sources, goals, real-time — without cookies or data sampling, and adds SEO and accessibility audits on Pro and Business.

Can I run Satsu alongside Google Analytics?

Yes, both scripts can run together while you migrate. Most people find they no longer need GA4 once Satsu is in place — one script, no banner, and the numbers you actually check.

Does Satsu need a cookie consent banner like GA4?

Built for GDPR: Satsu sets no cookies and keeps no persistent identifiers, so in our assessment no consent banner is needed. Check with your own counsel for your site.

Try the Google Analytics alternative that does more.